Which of the historical status of Durant or Wade is higher?

The historical status dispute between Durant and Wade can be comprehensively analyzed from three dimensions: honor accumulation, data performance and mainstream media evaluation:

1. Personal honor comparison

Durant:

Regional season MVP (2014)

2 Finals MVP (2017, 2018)

4 scoring champion (fourth in history)

13 All-Stars, 6 best team

2. Wade:

3 championships (2006, 2012, 2013), the 2006 single-core championship has outstanding gold content

1 finals MVP (2006)

1 scoring champion (2009)

13 All-Stars, 2 best team

Summary: Durant has a significant advantage in the number of MVPs and FMVPs and the number of scoring champions; Wade has more championships, but the last two championships in 2010 are affected by the controversy over the "three giants" grouping.

2. Data and game influence

Regular season efficiency:

Durant averaged 27.3 points per game, real shooting percentage 61.8%, and range covered the entire game;

Wade averaged 22.0 points per game, real shooting percentage 55.4%, and more balanced on the defensive end (career 1.5 steals + 0.8 blocks).

Key playoffs:

Wade averaged 34.7 points per game in the 2006 finals, reversing the championship with his performance as "God descended to earth"; in 2013, he showed his tough guy qualities;

Durant's two championships were extremely efficient during the Warriors period, but the label of "submission to the enemy" weakened his recognition of the key battle.

3. Mainstream media and historical rankings

Durant: generally ranks in the top 15 in history, and his advantages come from hard honors such as MVP and scoring champion;

Wade: mostly ranked 20-30, and although he has three championships, his lack of regular season MVP has become a shortcoming.

4. Dispute points

Wade supporters emphasized his single-core champion (2006) and integrated offense and defense, but mainstream evaluations pay more attention to personal top honors such as MVP; although Durant's "submission to the enemy" dispute affects the reputation, the accumulation of honor still dominates the judgment of historical status.

Conclusion: Comprehensive honors, data and authoritative rankings, Durant's historical status is higher than Wade, and the main gap is reflected in the top personal honors such as regular season MVP and scoring champion. But Wade's team achievements and key battle performance still constitute unique competitiveness.