Goodbye Reeves? It is revealed that the Lakers and Kings have 4-for-1, and East Zhan will welcome two All-Star Assistance?

1, 22-23 quarters 61.6%;

2, 23-24 quarters 58.9%;

3, 24-25 quarters 53.2%.

The real shooting rate hit a new low and its characteristic is offense. Obviously, Reeves played the worst season in his career so far.

From this perspective, it is not surprising that the Lakers were easily eliminated by the Timberwolves 4:1. To be precise, the ball that Reeves needs to carry was not carried. Of course, we can't blame Reeves for the Lakers' exit.

At the same time, it is generally believed that Reeves will reject the Lakers' four-year, 89.2 million contract renewal this summer, and then strive for a large contract of about 200 million in 26 years.

It is human nature to fight for a big contract, and it is understandable. But for the Lakers, there is a hidden danger. There is still a risk of leaving without any gain after one year's contract. This is just like Jeremy Lin in the past. In the summer of 22, in order to get Jeremy Lin, who performed crazy in the Knicks, the Rockets issued a three-year "poison" contract of 25.1 million. Due to the limitation of salary space, the Knicks had to give up the match and thus gave up the rising star.

What needs to be explained here is:

1. In the transaction of sending Westbrook away, Pelinka sent the first round of 27 years (the first four protected) to the Jazz;

2. In the transaction of Doncic, Pelinka sent the first round of 29 years (the unprotected) to the Mavericks.

Potential, if Reeves stays in the team as free agent, the Lakers will have very little room for reinforcement. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand why some media suggest that the Lakers trade Reeves. To be precise, take advantage of the current transaction value to maximize profits.

This is not the case with the US media "FW" suggesting that the Lakers and the Kings make a 4-for-1 deal. The specific plan is: the Lakers send Reeves, Finney Smith (signed), Vanderbilt, and two All-Star LaVine in the first round in 2011.

Dongzhan welcomes Ravin to assist?

Not considering whether it is equivalent, this potential transaction is still very likely to be reached in my opinion.

Reason 1: Results. First, they signed first and then exchanged for DeRozan, and then traded according to the lineup adaptability, but the problem is that the Kings still did not make it to the playoffs this season. If the record is not good, then the Kings may reorganize or even rebuild the lineup.

Reason 2: Attraction. Reeves is still attractive to the king when he has a certain amount of combat power. I mean, if you hit the playoffs, you can use your own or trade it again if you rebuild it later.

Of course, I don't think this potential deal is likely to be reached. After all, Reeves can basically do what Lavender can do. More importantly, Reeves' annual salary at this stage is less than one-third of Lavender's.

However, although it is unlikely to change Lave. But given the high probability that they will refuse to renew their contract in advance, I think it's only a matter of time before the Lakers trade Reeves this summer, with the high probability of leaving the team.