[Deep] What are the reasons for the Inter Milan failed in the championship competition?

. Zalevsky, who joined the winter window, is very critical. Inzaghi has tried many alternatives in the past, but he has not been able to break out of the shackles of traditional thinking, including Bissek and Dumfries appearing at the same time, and it has been proven that he can only be used as a special weapon in specific games (such as a team with obvious advantages and disadvantages against Barcelona).

Perhaps there is really no suitable candidate, which has led to the transformation of Xiao Inzaji stagnation until Zalai's appearance. Xiaoyin's Inter Milan has a very keen perception of space grabbing. The team lacks assaulters who can dribble the ball and cannot hit the speed. It often requires personnel to switch to play space on a large scale, or use the explosive power without the ball. Zalevsky is good at using the characteristics of space to discover by Xiaoyin, so that we see that he is no longer obsessed with the 352 system, but has specially created a 343 set for Zalevsky. The Polish young player is free from the wing and front midfielder and midfielder. His straight line dribbling and overall view of the ball when he has the ball make him feel as if he is in water in this system.

In the game where he lost the initiative to win the championship, Xiao Yin finally let go and defeated Turin and Como with an almost pure substitute lineup, which was extremely rare in the past. In the future, we may be able to see a more relaxed rotation system that has specific ideas even if we come on the bench. Buying out Zalevsky is the key first step.

(4) The referee issue

Finally, we need to talk about the referee issue. I believe this is a consensus that the level of Serie A referees has declined, but before, Inzaghi has always advocated "avoiding negotiation penalties" and "referees can make mistakes." After all, there are many games, and everyone has times to suffer losses and make profits. However, this season he mentioned the referees significantly more times.

After the Milan derby in the second round, Xiao Yin also began to count the adverse punishments he had suffered. At that time, Pavlovic kicked Tulam's calf while chasing back, causing the latter to fall to the ground. He said at the time: "This is how it was during this period: from Riyadh, to Bologna's foul on Tulam, to Lecce's Baskiroto handball, and the foul on Lautaro when playing Empoli, there will be five or six similar controversial punishments every weekend." Until the second round of the game against Roma, Bissek was pulled down in the penalty area and was ignored, which became the fuse that aroused Xiao Yin's anger. He was sent off for protests with a red card. After the game, the club rarely chose to collectively silence to avoid further punishment for comments.

Some fragments are not the most serious. The deeper impact is the loss on scale. More and more Serie A referees are imitating the standards of international referees enforcing European competitions, but lacking accuracy and empathy, which to a certain extent has condoned the occurrence of rough fouls. If the standards are different, law enforcement will easily collapse.

The most typical example is that in the first leg of the league, against Bologna. Pailetto was originally a "narrow-picking" referee, and averaged nearly 5 yellow cards per game. As a result, this game only gave the protesting Inzaghi one warning. Bologna's central defender Casaré has a very poor defense and can only rely on fouls of start-up and big moves to block Inter Milan's forward. It should have been sent off long ago, but he did not get a yellow card. It was also from that time that various clubs began to imitate this model to deal with Inter Milan, and achieved good results with the "help" of some referees. The credibility of the referee committee is also declining rapidly. Since last season, they have joined hands with Italian broadcasters to conduct a program to review controversial punishments. At the beginning, it is indeed quite conscientious. The person in charge, Rocky, personally gave a serious and responsible explanation, which also played a positive role in popularizing the referee work. But this season, in order to cover up the decline in referee level, they began to select those judgment clips that were not controversial to show their correctness. The experts invited to each episode are different, and some of them are not even clear about the basic expressions. In addition, they deliberately avoided the recording of communication between referees at key nodes, claiming to the program team that this was to avoid further controversy. So we saw that in the Pavlovic Toulam, Endika Bisek and Bisek handball incidents, the referee committee refused to provide complete recordings, which is also the reason why Marota wanted to negotiate. No one mentioned the "Marota League" again this season.

In addition, the accusation of the committee by the registered assistant referee Domenic Roca also exposed the problems of internal management chaos, including different treatment of different referees, unspoken compensation rules, etc. However, the clip of Ndikara over Bisek mentioned by him was originally a misjudgment admitted by the committee at the exchange meeting, but this did not make up for the points lost by Inter Milan on the field. Naples led by 1 point to win the championship, which was the smallest gap in recent years and the one that Inter Milan was most unwilling to accept.